св.синод среща политици

A meeting between the Synod of the Bulgarian Orthodox Chruch and prominent members of parliament (Photo: BGNES news agency)

EXPERT OPINION
 
To the 51st National Assembly
Regarding the Unified Bill for Amendments and Supplements to the Law on Religious Denominations
51-553-37-6 from 14.01.2025
 
SUMMARY
 
The opinion is expressed by the human rights organization "Freedom for All" through lawyer Dr. Viktor Kostov from the Sofia Bar, and supported by 20 religious denominations and individuals. It questions three bills voted on the first reading by the 51st National Assembly and combined into one unified bill that proposes amendments to the Law on Religious Denominations of the Republic of Bulgaria, with the goal of introducing state interference in the country's religious life, particularly within Orthodoxy.
 
The main arguments against the bills include:
1. Violation of the Constitution (CRB) and the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) – The bill contradicts the principle of the separation of church and state (Article 13, para. 2, Article 37, Article 11, etc. of the CRB, as well as Article 9 of the ECHR), creating the conditions for establishing a de facto state religion and interference in the internal life of religious communities.
2. Restriction of the rights to association for believers – The bills restrict the right of people with Orthodox Christian faith to self-identify as part of religious communities that do not belong to the Bulgarian Orthodox Church – Bulgarian Patriarchate (BOC-BP).
3. Violation of the principle of secular power – The proposed changes risk creating a legislative monopoly over religious beliefs, subordinating the right to believe to political will.
4. Disregard for judicial decisions – Contrary to the principle of the separation of powers, the bill aims to overturn a decision of the Supreme Court of Cassation regarding the registration of the "Bulgarian Orthodox Old Rite Church" (BOSRC), as well as decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR).
5. Historical and theological inconsistency – The author and supporting individuals and denominations contest the right of the state to decide religious matters and interfere in the spiritual life of the Orthodox Church.
The bill and its original sources from the separate bills are also criticized for creating a monopoly on Orthodox belief and granting the state excessive power over the religious freedom and practices of citizens. The opinion insists on rejecting these bills to protect basic human rights and democratic principles in Bulgaria.
The opinion spans eight pages and includes a list of supporting denominations, religious communities, and individuals.

maxresdefault

 

By Peter Števkov


The overthrow of Bashar al-Assad will go down in history as one of the most cynical operations by the powers in the Middle East.

And suddenly everything changed in a few days. The world was left in awe, the great powers were silent, Assad surprisingly gave up power and flew to Moscow, Israel acted quickly.

It is almost impossible to unravel the complexity of it all, but something can indeed be unraveled, and it inspires amazement.

While the West celebrated the fall of Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad, the main Middle Eastern protégé of the US and Europe in the region – Israel – bombed the remnants of Syrian military infrastructure. Airports, air defense installations, tanks, ammunition depots, all military targets. According to witnesses, Syria was left with practically nothing in its arsenal.

Israel also rapidly expanded its occupation of the Golan Heights, capturing the peak of Mount Hermon. This is the highest mountain in Syria, which will give Jerusalem unlimited visibility over the entire country. Previously, Israel had a blind spot in its radar coverage of Syria behind Hermon.

photo 2024 11 28 13 53 42

The speech as given by prince Leo von Hohenberg, the great-grandson of archduke Franz Ferdinand in November of 2024 at the Artstetten castle in Austria as a part of a peace initiative.


Artstetten 2024 11 16

Allow me to clarify right away that I am not a historian, a politician, or philosopher. In fact, I have no particular qualification to stand here and speak to you, other than by an accident of birth. I am, however, a father, a husband, an officer of the Austrian army reserve, and a Christian, and I feel a duty to try to do whatever I can in the service of peace. Just like all of you here, I want to safeguard our beliefs, norms, and freedoms as the basis for a fulfilling and peaceful life for the next generation.

The upheavals of the last decade with mass migration, the total erosion of the traditional
values of the West and, more recently, general warmongering have prompted me to make a statement here. The assassination of my great-grandfather heralded the first catastrophe of the 20th century, which was preceded by a wave of moral confusion and, ultimately, enthusiasm for war, not unlike our current situation.

Before I can speak about peace, I would like to step back and analyze, how we came to our current situation: a divided world that is again steering dangerously near to world war, and which is currently experiencing a war of a different kind.

 

photo 2024 11 28 13 53 48

This is the speech delivered by Dr. Jurášek (photo above, far right), a counselor to the Slovak prime-minister, at the Conservative Summit, held in Bratislava in November 2024. Presented here with the kind permission of the author.
-- from the Editor
Nov. 29, 2024


What is the best way to preserve and spread national and conservative values?

For long years I believed it is this: to deeply follow your conscience, intuition, what you feel deep inside, do it with your full heart, positive attitude, pure intention and to not care whether it is popular or politically effective. I believed that if you do the right thing, then God, Providence, Fate, vis maior – you name it – will make the rights thing happen at the right time.

For me, that meant I did not care about what is popular, just what is true; I did not care whether my articles were read by a hundred or by a hundred thousand, whether I was praised by anyone, whether I would one day be elected or have a career in politics. I did not want any sponsors, I did not want to work with political parties. I did not want any money for what I was doing. It had to be pure, volunteering, bottom-up, grassroots. That was the purest form of activism I could envision. I felt as a speck of light against a big, bad system.

Actually, there is a name for this approach. It was coined by Václav Havel, with whom I disagree on many things, but I believe he got this one right. He named it the “power of the powerless”, which basically means that if you face a big, bad, totalitarian system, it might feel hopeless at first. But if you observe more carefully, you find that the system has many internal tensions and inconsistencies. Many people follow it out of fear, greed or mindless, mechanical habit; there is very little authenticity and morality. So even though the system may seem powerful from outside, it is dead inside.