FREEDOM FOR ALL
MASS MIGRATION – ACCIDENT, NECESSITY, OR A PROJECT?
A Christian response to one of the great challenges of our time
Issue 67
August 2026
Edition in English: October 2026
DOWNLOAD THE MAGAZINE VOLUME FOR FREE FROM THIS LINK (177 PAGES, PDF, 1.3 MB)
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION: MASS MIGRATION AND THE CHRISTIAN POSITION 3
THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE TOWER OF BABEL HAS NEVER STOPPED 9
MASS MIGRATION AS A DELIBERATELY ORCHESTRATED PROCESS 21
IS MASS MIGRATION A COINCIDENCE, NECESSITY OR DELIBERATE PROJECT? 35
THE DYSTOPIAN NOVEL "THE MOSQUE OF NOTRE-DAME DE PARIS": 2026–2048 53
THE HOUR HAS STRUCK. EUROPE BETWEEN SELF-ABANDONMENT AND RENEWAL 73
RECENT MIGRATION IN EUROPE: NECESSITY OR DESIGN? 99
MASS MIGRATION AND THE SELFISH RESPONSE OF WHITE CHRISTIANS 131
MASS MIGRATION AND THE GOD - ORDAINED ORDER: A CHRISTIAN ANALYSIS OF THE CONTEMPORARY
CIVILIZATIONAL CRISIS 147
ABOUT THE AUTHORS 173
INTRODUCTION: MASS MIGRATION AND THE CHRISTIAN POSITION
Issue 67 of Freedom for All
Introductory words from the Editor
Mass migration is a reality to which the world has gradually begun to grow accustomed. The problem with this growing familiarity is that a significant part of contemporary migration flows is no longer taking place within established legal mechanisms, but under conditions of weakened control, political indecision, and institutional fragmentation. Although national and international legal regimes provide clear procedures for the movement of people, these mechanisms often remain without effective application. One possible reason is the unwillingness or inability of political leaders to place the issue of migration at the center of their responsibility toward their citizens. Thus, the mass flows from Africa and the Middle East toward Europe, as well as from Latin America toward the United States, have become a phenomenon that combines organized movement with chaos in its consequences, social tensions, and significant costs for receiving societies.
Read more: MASS MIGRATION – ACCIDENT, NECESSITY, OR PROJECT?
FREEDOM FOR ALL
THE STATE OF ISRAEL – POLITICAL REALITY AND THEOLOGICAL TRUTH
Issue (volume) 65
July-October 2025
Publication in English: October 2026
DOWNLOAD THE JOURNAL ISSUE FOR FREE FROM THIS LINK (111 PAGES, 1 MB, PDF)
Contents
FOREWORD TO THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDITION 1
ISRAEL, THE STATE OF ISRAEL, THEOLOGY AND POLITICS 3
THE STATE OF ISRAEL—A STOLEN IDENTITY 7
GENOCIDE ACROSS 360 SQ. KM IN TODAY'S WORLD OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL CHAOS 33
ZIONISM IS…ANTISEMITISM – FOUR THESES WITH A PRELUDE 49
THE PEOPLE AND THE STATE OF ISRAEL – ORIGIN, CONFLICTS AND CHALLENGES TO CHRISTIAN VIEWS 65
THE STATE OF ISRAEL – THE OPPRESSOR-VICTIM 91
INFORMATION ABOUT THE AUTHORS 101
Endnotes 105
FOREWORD TO THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDITION
A few introductory words are necessary for readers of this English edition. Свобода за всеки, or Freedom for All, is a publishing and human rights collective composed of writers, editors, academics, and contributors interested in the intersection of human civic freedoms and Christian theological concepts concerning the dignity of man and freedom within the eternal truth of God's love and salvation. Since its founding in 2002, our work has been published through our website and a periodic scholarly-popular journal. We also maintain a limited number of English publications on a separate website. Today, English has established itself as the dominant global language of communica-tion and trade, much as Greek was in the first century.
The theme of this issue explores perspectives from several Bulgarian Christian writers on the relationship between the state of Israel and the Christian faith. Our aim is to shed light on this important topic for both the Church and non-Christians alike. The subject is not only political, social, and moral but also carries eternal significance. While primarily intended for a Bulgarian audience, the English translation has been undertaken because ofthe universal relevance of the topic.
Read more: THE STATE OF ISRAEL – POLITICAL REALITY AND THEOLOGICAL TRUTH
Summary
This brief analysis critically examines the judgment in case C-43/24 Shipov of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU).[1] The CJEU ruled that Bulgaria's refusal to allow a mobile EU citizen to change the gender entry in civil-status records was incompatible with EU law because it unjustifiably hindered free movement and interfered with protected private-life interests. The thesis supported is that with this judgment the Court exceeds the competences granted to it, violates the principles of conferred competence and subsidiarity and intervenes in the field of family law and civil status, which are the competence of the Member States. The transformation of free movement into an instrument for substantive legal interference in the sovereign domestic law of the Member States is also analyzed.
- Introduction
The judgment in case C-43/24 Shipov[2] of the Court of Justice of the European Union represents a worrying moment in the development of European Union law. It raises questions about the limits of judicial interpretation and the role of the Court in the process of European integration. The Court held that a Member State’s refusal to allow a change in the gender recorded in civil status records could create obstacles to the exercise of the right to free movement.
- Factual and legal framework
Herein is a summary of the facts and developments of the case. The case concerns a Bulgarian national, registered at birth as a man, who subsequently identifies and lives as a woman. The person settles in Italy, where he begins hormone therapy and builds a social life in accordance with his gender identity. The discrepancy between his appearance and official documents causes difficulties in everyday life. In 2017, a request was filed in Bulgaria to change the gender recorded, the name and the data in the civil status registers, which was rejected. This rejection then led to a number of appeals, all the way to the Supreme Court of Cassation of Bulgaria, where the issue was debated and a case was brought before the Constitutional Court (CC). The question before the CC to be determined was narrowed down by the constitutional judges to state whether sex has only a biological meaning as per the Constitution.
As a result of these procedural developments in the course of the dispute, the Supreme Court of Cassation referred the matter to the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Bulgaria. The latter held that according to the Bulgarian Constitution the concept of “gender” has only a biological meaning.
The streets of Vienna
The speech was delivered by Dr. Viktor Kostov at the international “Conference on Values” held in Vienna by “U-Turn for Europe” in April of 2026
Ladies and gentlemen,
Europe today stands at a crossroads — not merely political or economic, but civilizational. We are confronting a deeper question: what sustains a civilization, and what happens when it forgets the sources of its own strength?
For centuries, Europe was shaped by two great forces: the moral vision of Christianity and the development of classical human rights. These were not accidental. They formed the backbone of Europe’s understanding of law, authority, dignity, and justice. They were lived realities that shaped laws, cultures, institutions, and the very concept of human dignity.
Yet today, many of these foundations are no longer confidently affirmed. In some cases, they are openly questioned or dismissed.
Bulgaria and the Civilizational Model of Europe
Consider Bulgaria. Founded in 681, it is one of the oldest European states to have preserved its name and identity across centuries. In the 9th century, under Boris I, Christianity was adopted as the state religion. This was not merely spiritual — it was civilizational.
The work of Cyril and Methodius and their disciples gave the Slavic world not only an alphabet, but a cultural and spiritual framework. Language, literacy, theology, and identity were woven into a durable civilizational fabric. Bulgaria aligned itself with a broader European transformation: a worldview in which law, morality, and authority were accountable to something higher than raw power.
This is what Europe once did at its best: it did not merely govern territory; it shaped cultures through meaning, education, and moral vision. Across the continent, rulers came to be seen as morally accountable. The idea that power must answer to justice became embedded in European consciousness.
This moral framework later intersected with Enlightenment thought, producing the modern language of rights, law, and human dignity that still shapes Europe today.
