The building of the Council of Ministers
Sofia, April 1, 2026 - Thirteen Bulgarian evengelical churches and denominations are preparing to file a legal challenge before the Върховен административен съд (Supreme Administrative Court of Bulgaria) against specific provisions of newly adopted administrative Rules enacted by Order No. V-216/25.08.2025 of the Secretary General of the Council of Ministers.[1]
The challenged provisions introduce a system of prior administrative oversight over the participation of foreign religious ministers in worship and religious educational activities in Bulgaria. The Rules impose:
- requirements to justify the alleged “official necessity” of inviting a foreign religious minister;
- detailed notification obligations concerning the exact location and duration of religious activities;
- random administrative inspections of religious services;
- access by state authorities to internal registers of religious communities;
- administrative penalties for failure to comply with notification requirements;
- and the possibility of cross-border information requests regarding religious ministers.
According to the applicants, these measures go beyond statutory authority and effectively create a new legal regime through secondary legislation, without explicit parliamentary authorization.
Eva Vlaardingerbroek, a Dutch political commentater, bringing hot issues to the discusion of Europe's future
Budapest, March 21, 2026 — CPAC Hungary 2026 brought together conservative political figures from Hungary and abroad in a highly stylized and politically charged event.[1] The conference, held just weeks before Hungary’s national elections, was marked by rally-like enthusiasm, with slogans such as “to victory” and “win baby win” setting a tone that combined traditional political discourse with elements of pop culture. The overall atmosphere underscored the high stakes for the ruling Fidesz party in the closely contested election race.
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán delivered a brief and focused speech, criticizing the European Union for its excessive interference in national sovereignty. Orbán framed the upcoming elections as a decisive battle for Hungary’s independence, positioning Fidesz as the defender of democracy against external pressure from Brussels.
Read more: CPAC Hungary 2026: A Showcase of Conservative Politics and Controversy
A moment from the meeting and the presentation of the speech
Artstetten, 15. Nov. 2025
By Prince Leo of Hohenberg, speech
I am honored to have been asked to speak a few words on the occasion of the commemoration of the assassination of my great grandparents, the first victims of World War One.
It is unfortunate that instead of speaking about the historic relevance of my ancestors, I feel I must take this opportunity to address such an illustrious and well-connected group of like-minded individuals, regarding the pretty dark times we are living in, and we should all do whatever we can in this spiritual battle of good against evil.
We are, once again, in the situation, where a centralised form of government and its powerful overreach, is completely detached from the people and from reality, in its obsessive desire to implement a utopian new world order.
It is therefore clear that everyone with any influence must get together and actively work on creating alternative networks to oppose the utopian ideologs and the warmongering military industrial influence in politics, media and current debates.
As Europeans with a common Christian heritage, we know that the Christian way is a call for the transformation of life not the affirmation of a utopian ideology and reckless selfdestructive tolerance.
It is therefore time to act and apply some practical resistance! And so, my purpose here today is to encourage all of you to create a counter-point to this.
My first appeal to you is to be loyal to your compatriots. Accept the truth that international organizations act mostly in their own interest and follow specific, predetermined agendas, which rarely reflect the voting public’s wishes. Governmental- and Nongovernmental Organizations are experts at concealing their agenda with a cloak of humanitarianism, which is actually the ultimate global Psy-Op.
What Karl Marx called the “run through the institutions” has been completed. The well-oiled machinery of shadow-structures behind the democratic facade, such as the UN, the Bank for International Settlements, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund among others, has been established and is fully functional, affecting every individual nation and its citizens.
Presented at the Conference: Central Europe on Its Own Path
October 24-26, 2025, in Prague, Czechia
By Viktor Kostov, Ph.D.
Introduction
As the world becomes increasingly polarized and global governance structures show signs of ideological and institutional fatigue, regions with shared historical, cultural, and spiritual legacies are rethinking their place within the international order. Central Europe, including South-Eastern Europe, both long defined by complex political heritage and strong cultural identities, stand today at a crossroads.
There is a growing awareness among intellectuals, policymakers, and citizens alike that the time may be ripe for a renewed form of political unity—one that respects national sovereignty while enabling greater cooperation. In this presentation, I will argue that the most viable and sustainable path for such unity is a confederacy, not a federation or supranational government. Furthermore, the foundation of this confederacy must rest on a firm ideological platform rooted in classical human rights, derived from Christian values and traditions.
This is not merely a call for regional integration, but a vision for a principled and pragmatic political project—one that reconciles freedom and order, identity and cooperation, sovereignty and solidarity.
Why a Confederacy?
- Pragmatic Formation and Structure
A confederacy offers a realistic, low-cost, and relatively swift path to institutional cooperation. Unlike a federation, which requires a deep and often irreversible pooling of sovereignty, a confederacy allows member states to retain their independence while creating joint governance mechanisms to pursue common goals.
Another model, already proposed by Mr. Zdeněk Koudelka, is a confederation with a shared head of state — and why not a king?[1] The argument is that legitimate authority derives from God, rather than emerging from within politically driven individuals or parties. As a result, the risks of corruption associated with elections could be reduced. The ruling dynasty could be selected from among the heirs of former royal families.
However, this historically tried and tested model is not without its drawbacks — at least at this stage of the discussion. First, inherited power does not necessarily prevent corruption; in some cases, it may even enable it. Second, the role of the Christian faith in the state has been significantly weakened, particularly after decades of communist rule and the subsequent rise of consumerism. Third, monarchies — or monarchic models — are often viewed with skepticism in today’s predominantly pro-republican climate. This is not a critique of the proposed model, but rather an acknowledgment of potential challenges it may face.
Read more: A Central European Confederacy and the Role of Classical Human Rights
